Legislating paid sick days is the right thing to do

presidents-message-webbanner-2020-en_0_1

We are running out of time.

Every day there’s a new study or argument published in newspapers or magazines, demanding paid sick leave to curb the spread of COVID-19 and its super-spreading variants.

Municipalities are taking up the fight, with the support of workers. Small businesses and public health experts are on side.

All at once, it’s as if Canadians collectively realized this injustice wasn’t just affecting them. Only 10% of low-wage and front-line workers and just 42% of all working Canadians have access to paid sick time.

These workers are left to make impossible choices. Keep working or starve.

A study for Peel Region found that of 7,874 people who later tested positive, a quarter of them went to work while showing symptoms of COVID.

Eighty people went to work even after testing positive for COVID-19.

The workplaces associated with the largest outbreaks were also those relying heavily on temporary workers, with one location using three separate temp agencies.

Low-wage temporary workers are compelled to work when they’re sick, because they don’t have paid sick days or access to other income supports and worry about losing their jobs or being punished if they miss any work.

The COVID-19 pandemic is a life or death issue, but in the world we’ve built, so is eviction, food security, and even having a job.

We cannot count on profit-driven corporations to do the right thing out of the goodness of their hearts.

According to a recent report, just 15% of local companies in Canada upgraded their sick leave policies during the pandemic.

It is clear that change must be legislated.

Mandating paid sick days is just the right thing to do. Workers need access to 14 sick days during a public health crisis like the current pandemic.

These protections should be the bare minimum, but coverage is sparse.

In the few jurisdictions where employer paid sick days are mandated, it is highly restricted.

PEI mandates one paid sick day per year after five continuous years of employment, and in Quebec, workers have access to two paid days per year after three continuous months of employment. In federally regulated sectors, the federal government sets the standards, and those laws only give workers three paid days.

In Ontario, the minimum standard is none, so workers are entitled to no paid sick days.

B.C. Premier John Horgan stands alone as the sole leader who has stated that the province is prepared to fill the deep gaps left in the Canada Recovery Sickness Benefit.

Premiers are the gatekeepers of most labour laws, yet provincial politicians are sitting on their hands, refusing to give all workers adequate sick days.

Provincial labour laws set the minimum standards for work in many industries. They are the first line of defense against exploitation, unfairness and unsafe working conditions.

However, one of Premier Doug Ford’s first acts of government was a sweeping repeal of labour law amendments that took away equal pay for equal work, paid sick days, and the $15 minimum wage.

This was a direct demand from the Retail Council of Canada, which ran a campaign calling on Ford to “Scrap it and start over!” The Council represents some of Canada’s largest minimum-wage employers such as Loblaw, Sobeys, Walmart Canada, and Metro.

The legislation that Ford scrapped was the result of a multi-year, province-wide review of working conditions that included workers, unions, employers, researchers and more.

It was tossed at the request of the same big businesses that are now posting record profits while their underpaid workers face illness and death.

When paid sick days were mandated in New York, the majority of small businesses supported the law, and complied without cutting hours, reducing hiring or raising prices. Job growth continued. The sky did not fall.

In Ontario, we have nearly one year of evidence of outbreaks in all types of workplaces, from health care to warehouses and manufacturing, nail salons and restaurants.

What are we waiting for? Provinces must step up now, fill this gap, legislate paid sick days, and make them permanent.

Unifor lobbies for aerospace recovery plan

Like so many industries, Canada’s aerospace sector is in trouble.

Most of the world’s aircraft fleets remain grounded amid tightening travel restrictions. This situation has begun to spill over into Canada’s aerospace industry, threatening to send aircraft manufacturing into a tailspin.

“It wasn’t long ago that 40 % of our aerospace members were laid off. The situation improved, but now we’re headed towards dangerous territory if the government doesn’t act,” said Jerry Dias, Unifor National President. “The introduction of new travel restrictions came without any new financial support for our aerospace and airline workers. That decision jeopardizes every aspect of Canada’s air travel infrastructure including advanced aerospace manufacturing.”

In response to the economic crisis, Unifor’s Aerospace Industry Council organized more than 100 meetings between union representatives and federal government Ministers, Members of Parliament from all parties, and senior staff to discuss the union’s proposal for a comprehensive recovery plan for the sector. The effort was Unifor’s single largest lobbying campaign to date.

“The response has been incredible. We’ve received overwhelming support from members of every political party and positive responses from key ministers in the federal government,” said Carmen Ledarney, Unifor’s Aerospace Director. “Even though this was a substantial undertaking for the union, our job isn’t over yet. We will continue to put pressure on the federal government until we see these recommendations fully implemented.”

An unprecedented decline in air travel brought on by pandemic-related travel restrictions has left empty order books for many of Canada’s major commercial aircraft manufacturers. The downturn is translating into fresh waves of layoffs hitting workplaces from British Columbia to Newfoundland and Labrador. Quebec has been particularly hard hit with significant layoffs expected at CAE, a manufacturer of flight and other simulator technologies as its ventilator manufacturing comes to an end, and Pratt and Whitney as the aircraft engine manufacturer reports a decline in long-term demand due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

“We are deeply concerned about what’s happening to our industry. Layoffs are happening at an alarming rate in every region of the country,” said Alexandre Lamarre, Unifor Aerospace Industry Council President. “In Quebec, aerospace is part of our DNA. At CMC Electronics in Saint-Laurent, 20 per cent of our members were laid off, many just before Christmas. It’s devastating and more layoffs may be coming if nothing is done. We have to see real government intervention to protect these valuable jobs immediately.”

While the federal government continues to postpone direct financial relief for the industry, aircraft manufacturers have few options and workers face an increasingly uncertain future. In perhaps the most acute example, Unifor members at De Havilland Aircraft in Toronto, Ontario report that the plant can only sustain work until spring 2021.

“Each job this industry loses is a huge blow,” added Dias. “These are highly-skilled workers making the high-tech products that our economy desperately needs. We need a solution that protects every aerospace job possible.”

Following the lobbying effort, Unifor launched an email campaign to urge local Member of Parliament and federal government ministers to fully implement the union’s Aerospace recovery plan. Unifor members are encouraged to visit the site here and send a message today.

All frontline health care workers deserve Ontario Pandemic Pay

Unifor is reiterating its demand that the Ontario government allocate funds to support all frontline health care workers.

“While we appreciate that personal support workers in some areas are eligible for either $2.00 or $3.00/hour pandemic pay, many of our COVID heroes remain excluded yet still face the same challenges,” said Jerry Dias, Unifor National President.

While frontline workers continue to risk exposure, many do not qualify to receive pandemic pay, despite the fact that the province has access to billions in unallocated pandemic relief funds.

Unifor recommends that the Ontario government make the following expansion to pandemic pay, retroactive to the October 1, 2020 announcement.

  1. Pandemic pay should include all frontline workers in Ontario Long-term Care Homes. Cleaners, laundry and dietary workers, rehab/activation workers, clerical workers and nurses are all on the frontline at significant personal risk. Yassin Dabeh, a 19-year-old contract cleaner, recently died of COVID-19 contracted while working in a nursing home in outbreak. He was excluded from pandemic pay.
  1. Retirement home workers, including personal support workers, should be included in pandemic pay. These workers, who generally work for for-profit employers, earn substantially less than their counterparts in the LTC sector. Retirement homes have experienced tragic outbreaks and continue to do so today.
  1. All frontline hospital workers should receive pandemic pay, including nurses, porters, cleaners and laundry workers, rehab workers, therapists, technicians and technologists, clerical workers and any others with patient contact.Hospital workers are subject to expanded redeployment legislation that could see them reassigned, even without their consent, to other hospitals and retirement homes in addition to LTC homes.
  1. All Paramedics and any other frontline EMS workers to be included in pandemic pay.

“Working through this pandemic will haunt frontline workers for years. Banking available funds that should be going to the frontline is unconscionable,” said Dias.

Unifor was the first union in Ontario to make a public demand for Pandemic Pay on April 17, 2020, with the launch of a video and online petition. The union has been steadfast in its position that any worker subject to the Emergency Orders should receive pandemic pay.

Bell Media cuts radio jobs, including on-air broadcast roles, in streamlining push

Article provided By: Canadian Press as posted on GuelphToday.com

Read the full article here…

 

Bell spokesman Marc Choma says there have been a limited number of staff reductions, but did not specify how many jobs had been cut

TORONTO — Bell Media says it has cut staff, including on-air broadcast roles, as part of a streamlining process.

Bell spokesman Marc Choma says there have been a limited number of staff reductions, but did not specify how many jobs had been cut.

Bell says the roles were cut due to programming decisions by Bell’s radio brands as part of the company’s streamlined operating structure.

Bell claims to be Canada’s largest radio broadcaster with 215 music channels, 109 licensed radio stations and 58 markets across Canada.

Last month, Bell Media confirmed it had restructured its leadership team leading to some staff departures.

The changes come as Bell Media puts greater priority on growing its streaming platforms.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 1, 2021.

Companies in this story: (TSX:BCE)

The Canadian Press

Bell blasted for taking $122M Labour subsidy while boosting dividends

Read the article here at TEKSAVVY

Bell Canada took a beating from members of parliament this week on several fronts, from its decision to cut rural network investment to the inordinate number of customer complaints it receives.

But the biggest item in MPs’ crosshairs was Bell’s confirmation that it has taken $122 million in pandemic-related labour subsidies despite posting strong financial results and boosting dividend payouts to shareholders.

Along with several other big telecom companies in 2020, Bell availed itself of the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy, a federal program that covers a portion of employees’ salaries in order to keep those workers from being laid off. The company also raised quarterly dividends throughout the year and is expected to again increase its fourth-quarter payout.

Nate Erskine-Smith, Liberal MP for Beaches-East York in Toronto and a member of the standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology, was pointed in his questions for Robert Malcolmson, Bell’s chief legal and regulatory officer. Here’s the exchange, with embedded video below:

 

Continue reading click the link above for TekSavvy